Decarbonization, university-wide freedom of information and food insecurity were discussed at the Student Senators Council’s weekly meetings on Thursday.
A resolution that would have NYU eliminate all fossil fuel usage from all NYU campuses was passed by the SSC almost unanimously at the end of October, with only three abstentions. As it prepared to go to University Senate, the Executive Committee — made up of NYU’s President Andrew Hamilton, SSC and Student Government Assembly Chair Hüsniye Çöğür, as well as other faculty and administrative leaders — decided it was not ready to be introduced to the floor.
“Instead it’s going to be sent to a Sustainability Standing Committee that’s under [Assistant Vice President for Sustainability Cecil Scheib],” Çöğür said. “That committee is going to be basically reviewing it, also giving some recommendations or comments or edits.”
Çöğür went on to say that a resolution that would institute a process by which students, faculty and staff could request and receive information about the university, introduced in mid-September, would be undergoing a similar process with the Senate Committee on Organization and Governance.
A topic that has gained traction in the community — food insecurity on campus — was also brought up by Çöğür in her report.
“I mentioned to [Hamilton] that [food insecurity has] been a really growing concern on campus,” Çöğür said at the meeting. “And I felt that there really wasn’t any tangible long-term goals for handling this situation and I think that, especially with the increasing number of students that have been using the Courtesy Meals Program, it’s clearly evident that there is a large demand for some sort of solution for this.”
The Courtesy Meals Program is an initiative by NYU which began in 2016 but was not heavily publicized until this semester. Up until this semester, only 40 to 60 students had been using the program, according to Vice President of Student Affairs Marc Wais. According to Alternate Senator-at-Large for students experiencing food insecurity Jakiyah Bradley, who received statistics from Wais, 543 students had used the program this semester as of Nov. 9, with an increase of almost 100 students between Oct. 31 and Nov. 9.
According to Çöğür, Hamilton offered to have a round table meeting between students working on the issue and important administrators. A date has not been set and a list of attendees has not been made, although it can be speculated that some potential members of the discussion would be Bradley, Wais, Çöğür and Hamilton.
Later on in the meeting, Çöğür discussed students’ potential lack of knowledge concerning the intricacies of student government, such as criticisms that the student government elections processes result in a lack of representation. This criticism mainly draws on the fact that former senators pick the 14 senators-at-large that make up part of the senate. However, some members of student government, such as Vice Chair Anesu Nyatanga, have pushed back on this belief.
“There’s been a lot of chatter and a lot of conversations around what student government is, how student government works, how does student government represent the student body and whether people think that’s fair or not,” Çöğür said. “We recognize, obviously, that student government navigates to make sure that they’re, especially right now, doing a better job of really getting out to people information about who we are, what we do, how we’re structured.”
Çöğür began to talk about ways that student government would be attempting to do this, and it was at that point that WSN’s reporter was asked to leave the room.
Email Victor Porcelli at [email protected].
Anon • Nov 30, 2018 at 9:53 am
Of course all of the senators at large are going to push back on the complaints… They want to stay in power! The SCHOOL senators and presidents are all in agreement that the way the process stands now is WHACK. The senators at large have no problem w/ it tho bc they get to keep their power as long as their friends are on SGA. School senators will tell you that SGA is extremely cliquey and childish. They are expected to stand in solidarity with one another rather than voting in the interests of their constituents LIKE THEY’RE SUPPOSED TO… So yeah, keep calling the students crazy and keep blaming us for not knowing enough about the situation… what a great way to maintain an open dialogue on campus.