New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

New York University's independent student newspaper, established in 1973.

Washington Square News

A mural of a woman’s face holding up a chain with the word “LOISAIDA” and a gold cityscape. The words “el bohio murals” and “#BRINGARTBACK” are next to the woman alongside the words “CURATED BY … THRIVECOLLECTIVE.ORG.”
Activists’ 25-year fight to revive an East Village community center
Dharma Niles, Deputy News Editor • Mar 12, 2024
A front entrance with the text “Electric Lady Studios” written in a retro white font on two reflective walls.
‘An exploitative environment’: The interns behind Electric Lady Studios
Julia Diorio, Music Editor • Feb 20, 2024

Political polls detrimental to political process

Electoral polls were created with somebody like me in mind. Yes, I’m that politics junkie with an unhealthy obsession with statistical gratification that will support my own views, who craves the latest information about how the world thinks, whom others support and what tides are rolling in on the political landscape. And someone who would like to believe he can help shape that. However, I know these polls are bad for me because it’s becoming increasingly difficult to see the pressing need that allegedly exists for pollsters calling me every week and collecting this data. In the end, voters are ill-served.

Just think about the effects on our election season, which the media has locked in a full nelson. We would rather have a superficial retelling of what’s going on in the minds of average, often uninformed, voters than a substantive debate on issues that affect the electorate daily. By merely examining which candidate is doing the better job of wooing certain demographics, we conveniently forget about aggressive foreign policy, weakening deficit control and increased executive power. And by rating candidates on a 10-point scale, we further simplify countless policy decisions down to a meaningless integer. We disregard the poor and alienated because we’re told the middle class is the only constituency that matters. And we’re fed denigrating campaign ads over and over instead of promoting positive change.

Imagine, if you will, what would actually be lost if we cut out the political polling. Perhaps our news outlets would go back to being a check on government authority instead of insipid data collectors. Perhaps debates would be more fair. Instead of catering to the candidates who are leading at the time and to the issues that employ the more divisive buzzwords. Perhaps we would be less susceptible to partisan scare tactics aimed at exploiting the numbers to create more fundraising opportunities. You know, things like: “He’s got a slight edge in the polls and if he wins, civilization as we know it will cease to exist! Donate now!” And while I can’t prevent my mom from forwarding along partisan chain emails with indirectly the same purpose, the party establishment would have less ammunition to use.

It’s all about perception anyway — the perception of the average voter. But what average voters know and understand should not be the rubric by which we decide who sits in the most important office in the world. If it were, we’d be confined to a pre-ordained smorgasbord of talking points. Likability can certainly be a factor, but let it be a factor that manifests itself in the voting booth and not on CNN in hopelessly cumbersome breaking news analyses.

Political polling is detrimental to democratic elections in that votes lose their impact. Citizens believe they no longer have tenable choices, so they’re forced to settle for supporting a candidate who is less than ideal, simply because polls have written off the rest as unelectable. These weekly numbers are a mere political puppet show, one whose audience is mystically drawn in without realizing the greater media and corporate forces pulling the strings at the top.

So, Quinnipiac and Rasmussen and Gallup and company: I’m going to stop nibbling on this inane pretzel logic that defines American electoral politics. I’m just hoping everybody else doesn’t take too big of a bite. Otherwise, they might choke.

A version of this article appeared in the Sept. 6 print edition. Chris DiNardo is opinion editor. Email him at [email protected].

View comments (1)
More to Discover

Comments (1)

Comments that are deemed spam or hate speech by the moderators will be deleted.
All Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 

  • R

    Reilly McCloskeySep 18, 2012 at 2:04 am

    Great Article Chris. I find that the most important things a president has to handle in todays world, are foreign policy, and ways to improve our economy. I dont care about polls, the average person watching tv for polls is an idiot hahaha, whos to say they are accurate anyway. The fact of the matter is, as a nation we are not doing the right thing abroad, not in any circumstances. Instead of being global force for good, where we can help nations develop and give our assistance, we just aid in wars, and drone strike civilians. Nothing seems right about that. If we do want to get our economy fixed, we need serious change in the way business is handled in america. Is it impossible to think that as a country we can unify to create a country that manufactures and works together to enjoy a positive way of life that we have now. it didnt just happen, we worked hard as a country. I guess its not as easy as it just happening. but nobody is leading us in that direction currently. And who knows maybe thats not the solution. but it worked before.

    Reply