Thursday, Apr 17, 2014 09:41 am est

Armstrong’s admission to doping charges insincere, dishonest

Posted on January 30, 2013 | by Alison Wallach

By now we’ve all heard the news, and most of our mouths are no longer agape. Athletic and philanthropic hero Lance Armstrong, seven-time winner of the Tour de France from 1999 to 2005, has admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs.

In a recent two-and-a-half-hour “no holds barred” interview with Oprah Winfrey, the disgraced athlete apologized for his personal demons. He confessed to the charges that he once vehemently dismissed, admitting to the use of a slew of banned substances including erythropoietin, cortisone and testosterone, in addition to blood transfusions during his Tour de France wins. We are talking about masterminded, deliberate schemes, dating back to the mid-’90s, and involving what Winfrey referred to as “systematic doping rings in several countries.”

As captain of the U.S. Postal Service cycling team, Armstrong dragged everyone down with him. Despite his claim that he never verbally pressured his teammates into using performance-enhancing drugs, several teammates have asserted that Armstrong’s will to win led to demands to participate in the drug culture.

Armstrong may have apologized, but for every expression of remorse, there was an excuse. From feeling justified in his use of testosterone following his battle with testicular cancer to emphasizing the doping culture of cycling during that time to complaining that he was treated differently than others charged with substance use, Armstrong’s have apologies lost their integrity.

Never once did he express true feelings of guilt. He expressed regret over his character flaws, but explained his actions as results of his controlling competitive drive like an attorney trying to trick a jury.

Armstrong views his ban from participating in any competition sanctioned by a governing body as a death penalty, but the court and the public have spoken — Armstrong is not above the law, no matter what inherent flaws he may claim.

If Armstrong hopes this interview will bring him back into America’s good graces, he’s fooling himself. He comes off as a conceited, temperamental teenager, admitting to wrongdoing after he has already been caught in the hopes of mitigating his punishment.

There is one fatal flaw in this plan. His biking privileges have already been revoked, not by a parent whose convictions can be swayed with a little cajoling, but by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency.

He has like the boy who cried wolf, and he knows it. During the interview he said, “I’m not the most believable man in the world right now.” Nothing he says can be believed at this point, and his case is not any better for maintaining that he rode clean in 2009 and 2010.

If only kids listened to the wisdom of parents and elementary school teachers, who drilled into our brains the idea that lying is bad, lying to cover up lies is worse and trying to regain someone’s trust after you have lied is the most Herculean task of them all — even more challenging than winning the Tour de France.

He may have raised over $500 million for cancer research through his Livestrong foundation, but out of lies rose the belief and hope for both cancer patients and a citizenry hungry for a miracle. It is time for a more reliable role model.

 

But, we continue to add zeros to the end of our athletes’ paychecks, increasing the incentive to cheat, diminishing the honor in sports and reflecting society’s “win at all costs” mentality. We too readily justify the means as long as we’re satisfied by the ends. We need to change the way we look at success if we ever expect to see an end to corruption in sports or in any field.

I believe in second chances, but Armstrong has had more than enough opportunities to clean up his act, and I do not care to hear about what progress he makes toward correcting his flaws in the future. I do not think we know the full story, nor do I think we ever will. Armstrong wanted fame and he got infamy. He may be neve be forgotten, but he also should not be forgiven.

Comments

CLOSE [x]
CLOSE [x]
CLOSE [x]
Tatiana Baez

Assistant Managing Editor | A CAS junior, Tatiana is studying journalism, environmental science and politics. She’s a bomb editor, as well as the staff’s main source of entertainment because she sings along to every song after 12 a.m. She also writes about culture, science, technology and sex, and her work has been featured in VICE, Motherboard, Elite Daily, amNewYork and others. She enjoys eating Thai food, reading fiction and binge-watching Netflix.

And in case you were wondering how great she really is — “I just can’t get enough of Tatiana” is a direct quote from her EIC at WSN only moments ago.

AS
Ann Schmidt

News Editor | Ann is a liberal studies sophomore who lived in Florence during her freshman year. She plans on double-majoring in journalism and political science and is always busy. She is constantly making lists and she loves to laugh.

 

DY
Daniel Yeom

Daniel started at the Features desk of WSN last Spring, writing restaurant reviews whilst indulging on free food and consequently getting fat. Last Fall, he was the dining editor, and he this semester he is senior editor. Daniel is in Gallatin (living the dream) studying Food & Travel Narratives, incorporating aspects of Food Studies, Journalism, and Media, Culture, and Communication. He loves food more than life itself.

Hannah Luu

Deputy Multimedia Editor | Hannah Luu is a ridiculously great Deputy Multimedia Editor. She is a sophomore from Northern California. If you think Northern California means San Francisco you might need to closely examine a map. She is passionate about NPR and being half Asian.

CLOSE [x]
  • How to join:

    The Washington Square News holds open weekly budget meetings at its office located at 838 Broadway every Sunday. All are welcome to attend, no matter your background in journalism, writing, or reporting. Specific times for meetings by desk are listed below. If you wish to talk to an editor before you attend, feel free to check out the Staff page.

    NEWS FEATURES MULTIMEDIA SPORTS ARTS OPINION
    5 P.M. 6 P.M. 6 P.M. 6:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M. 7 P.M.

    Applying for an editor position: Applications for editor positions during the fall or spring semesters are available twice each academic year and can be found here when posted. Applications for the Fall 2012 semester are closed, but check back for Spring 2013. Those who wish to apply are urged to publish pieces in the newspaper and contact current editors for shadowing.

    History of the Washington Square News:

    The Washington Square News is the official daily student newspaper of New York University and serves the NYU, Greenwich Village, and East Village communities. Founded as an independent newspaper in 1973, the WSN allows its undergraduate writers and photographers to cover campus and city news and continues to grow its strong body of award-winning journalists and photographers.

  • The WSN has a circulation of about 60,000 and can be found in over a hundred purple bins distributed throughout campus. It is published Monday through Thursday during the fall and spring semesters and online on Friday, with additional special issues published in the summer. The newspaper recently revamped its website during the Fall 2012 semester.

    Like few campus newspapers in the country, the paper is editorially and financially independent from the university and is solely responsible for selling advertisements to fund its production. The WSN, including its senior staff, is run solely by current undergraduate students and the business-division is largely student-operated as well.

    A Board of Directors comprised of alumni, NYU professors and working news media professionals serves as advisors to the paper. Board members have no control in the WSN's editorial policy or newsroom operations. Alumni of the newspaper are established and leading journalists in such news organizations as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, NBC news, ABC news, Fox News, and USA Today.

    Next