Thank Racism, Not Anti-Elitism, For Trump
November 14, 2016
The first step in defeating President-elect Donald Trump is correctly identifying how he won, and on this count, the left is already failing. In the aftermath of Trump’s victory, people on the left wrote and shared articles and commentary which deflected blame for Trump’s success off of his voters. They opted instead to blame liberal elites who failed to adequately address the political concerns of the working class, driving them into Trump’s arms. This take is inaccurate, and eludes the real reason behind his victory: white male racial and sexist backlash.
Pinning blame on the actions and attitudes of liberal elites assumes that the impetus for the white working class’s embrace of Trump was primarily a medley of anti-elitism and valid economic concerns. Anyone who watched Trump these past 17 months should know better. He started his campaign by calling Mexican immigrants rapists; he has repeatedly disparaged women with derogatory language, he has suggested that all Muslims are extremists, that blacks are simultaneously dangerous animals and hopeless victims and hinted that Jews comprise a shadowy cabal that controls the global economy. Bigotry is not incidental to Trump’s appeal — it is the only consistent part of it.
Moreover, Trump’s electoral support from whites of every income level demonstrates that colorblind “populist discontent” is not the thread that ties Trump voters together. That thread is race, and pretending otherwise is sophistry at its most elusive and dangerous.
This misdiagnosis matters because the left’s attempts to woo the white working class back into its coalition implicitly accepts the appeasement of anti-black policy. Too many leftists have pushed for outreach to the white working class without considering what that would actually look like. As history and present make blazingly clear, the white working class’s most notable collective policy preference is white tribalism. We saw this with the rise of the Know-Nothing Party in the mid 19th century, for example. Their successful inclusion requires obliging anti-black, anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim policy. Even worse, understanding the stakes and attempting inclusion anyway would sacrifice the wellbeing of our already vulnerable non-white citizens. The only responsible path forward is rejecting romantic overtures to disaffected, white Trump supporters. Democrats must instead double down on anti-racism efforts and organize to repeal the legal and social conditions that artificially suppress the political clout of minorities.
Whereas the past half-century of politics have tried to reject overt racism in favor of quieter institutionalized versions, however Donald Trump has announced its presence with a bullhorn. Minimizing his victory isn’t just bad politics and it doesn’t just threaten future Democratic candidates. By attempting to include the white working class in their coalition, liberals are abandoning Americans who need help the most — the minorities oppressed by Trump and his followers.
Opinions expressed on the editorial pages are not necessarily those of WSN, and our publication of opinions is not an endorsement of them.
A version of this article appeared in the Monday, November 14th print edition. Email Matthew Perry at [email protected].
Man with the Axe • Nov 14, 2016 at 11:02 pm
First, you got the century wrong for the Know Nothing party.
Your recommendations, if accepted, will result in the Democrats never winning another national election. If you adopt policies specifically intended to discourage white working class people from joining your side you are not only being (hypocritically) racist, you are going to engender enthusiasm in that group to oppose you. It is that enthusiasm that led to Hillary’s defeat. It came from white people believing what you wrote, namely, that the progressives think they are all racists and therefor you hate them and will work against their interests.
Your claim that white people are pretty much all racists sounds very much like Trump’s claims about Mexicans and Muslims that you decry in this very article. Don’t you see that?
Todd Elliott Koger • Nov 14, 2016 at 12:22 pm
Please stop this philosophically inconsistent hypocrisy. The daily protest in America’s streets because Hillary Clinton lost. Racial chatter from the media every hour on the hour, that is preventing “president-elect” Donald Trump fair opportunity to get started. Your madness is just further disenfranchisement of America’s most historical minority group.
Donald Trump owes his victory to “predominately black Democratic strongholds of Pennsylvania who were convinced to give Mr. Trump 31 percent more votes than the previous Republican Party presidential candidate. African Americans like Todd Elliott Koger helped convinced 130,000 blacks in Pennsylvania and hundreds of thousands more in various other states to boycott our traditional Democratic Party vote this election.
Mr. Trump’s “margin of victory” is realized when you combine an increase of “Obama white voters” in Wisconsin and Michigan voting Trump in 2016. Trump won Pennsylvania by 1.1 percentage points (68,236 votes), Wisconsin by 0.9 points (27,257 votes), Michigan by 0.2 points (11,837 votes). If Clinton had won all three states, she would have won the Electoral College 278 to 260. She fell short in all three.Trump’s victory in these three states was a big shift from 2012, when Obama won Michigan by 9.5 points, Wisconsin by 6.7 points, and Pennsylvania by 5.2 points. Although the national vote swung only about 3 points toward GOP in 2016, these three states swung by 6 to 10 points.
Donald Trump had reached out to black voters and promised a “new deal” for our neighborhoods. But the simplemindedness of Hillary Clinton’s supporters and mainstream media is putting the needs of black America behind the needs of every other special interest group again. How many times do we have to ask you . . . DOES BLACK LIVES MATTER?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dieNd5h_qpw