Wednesday, Aug 20, 2014 10:22 pm est

Noam Chomsky and Carne Ross discuss means and goals of OWS

Posted on September 17, 2012 | by Edward Radzivilovskiy

Today is the anniversary of Occupy Wall Street. To investigate the meaning of Occupy and its goals and demands, I interviewed two of its fervent supporters. In January, I sat down  with world-renowned philosopher and professor Noam Chomsky, and then in June, with former top-ranking British diplomat Carne Ross. Both assert that one of the most striking features of this movement has been its paradoxical quality of both unity and incoherence. No single individual has the authority to dictate a cohesive list of demands for the rest to follow; matters are decided collectively though assemblies, discussions and debates.

The very disorganization of the movement provides the grounds for its legitimacy as a truly democratic effort.

“If you investigate the movement and you ask them what are their demands, they are reticent to answer and rightly so, because they are essentially crafting a point of view from many disparate sources,” professor Chomsky said.

Ross expressed a similar feeling.

“There is no single motto of Occupy. That’s one of its great virtues and perhaps one might argue is also one of its weaknesses,” Ross said. “There is a single concern, which is inequality and the state of the economic and the political system today. And Occupy is a movement that is trying to address this in many different ways.”

Chomsky and Ross posit that the corporate capitalistic structure reduced the majority of the people into non-critical agents who have very little power over policy decisions, which are decided by the elite in support of the elite. Chomsky claims Occupy “should be regarded as … the first major public response to about thirty years of a really quite bitter class war … in which the system of democracy has been shredded.”

One question I posed separately to both men concerned how exactly to go about replacing this system. Would a series of reforms be substantial to change the system, or can this be done only through revolution?

Chomsky dismisses the notion that what is happening can be called a revolution.

“First of all, we are nowhere near the limits of what reform can carry out,” Chomsky said. “People can have the idea of a revolution in the back of their minds if they want. But there are very substantive actions that should be taking place.”

Chomsky then qualified this statement by saying that if these substantive reforms lead to the creation of permanent participatory institutions, in the long-term, they would amount to a revolution.

Ross countered, arguing that the substantive reform avenue does not seem to be a tenable choice for activists if they want to affect fundamental change. He asserts that a revolution is the only proper channel for this.

“I don’t think I do agree that substantive reform … will happen given the circumstances we find ourselves in. You’ve got to take a power analysis to this: who has power and who does not.” Ross said. “Power inequality is growing along with wealth inequality. Power means that those with power, with the greatest wealth, have the greatest influence over policy. This is not the way it should work in theory, but in practice what we have is that people with power and influence, say Jamie Dimon who runs J.P. Morgan, he has much more access and influence over policy than you or I or Noam Chomsky ever will.”

Ross clarified that he is also talking about a gradual process, not a turbulent or violent upheaval. But if revolution is gradual, and reform is not possible, how can revolution even come about?

The diplomat contends that the system will be replaced only through concrete radical actions that directly challenge the current political and economic order. An example of such an action, which is distinguishable from reform in Ross’ view, would be setting up participatory banking structures. Ross himself is involved in setting up an “Occupy Bank” and encourages everyone to undertake similar strategies.

Though I see Chomsky’s reasoning that significant changes in policies may be possible and necessary for the overall equation, I also think Ross’ focus on revolution rather than reform adds gravitas to the understanding that this is a fight against the corporate capitalist machine, not a fight to improve it.

I hope the anniversary of this movement can spawn a more aggressive approach that will push for a combination of massive reform and the creation of alternative democratic systems.

Edward Radzivilovskiy is a contributing writer. Email him at

In the previous version of this article, WSN incorrectly reported that J.P. Diamond is the chief executive of J.P. Morgan. In fact, Jamie Dimon is the chief executive of J.P. Morgan. WSN regrets the error. 


  • Victor Lester

    Very interesting article! Straight to the point! Well done! It is really impressive that readers can understand and compare two different and unique points of view in the matter of Occupy Movement.

  • Veronika M.

    I am glad I read this. If I had to choose sides, I would go with Mr. Chomsky.

  • Anna A.

    Completely agree with the author. Society needs massive reforms but unfortunately they couldn’t be done peacefully.

  • Archer Y.

    What kind of revolution is Carne Ross talking about if he is against “violent upheaval” ?

    • Eric

      I think Mr. Ross’ point is that the means are the ends, not that the ends justify the means or vice versa. so, if you use violent means to achieve an end, you will just produce more violence. but if you try to create change through radical democratic actions then you can produce democratic ends.

      • Yolanda A.

        Yes, I guess you are right, Eric. This is a complicated issue.

  • Yolanda A.

    I kind of like when Occupy activists call themself “the 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%.” However, I am pretty sure that our society is not ready for any kind of Worlwide revolution (especially for a non-violent one)

profile portrait
Felipe De La Hoz

Multimedia Editor | Felipe De La Hoz is a Colombian national studying journalism at the College of Arts and Sciences. Having been born in Colombia and raised in the United States, Mexico and Brazil, Felipe is a trilingual travel aficionado and enjoys working in varied and difficult environments. Apart from his photography, Felipe enjoys investigative reporting and interviews, interviewing the likes of Colombian ex-M-19 guerrilla fighters and controversial politician Jimmy McMillan. He has covered everything from governmental conferences to full-blown riots, as well as portraiture shoots and dining photography. Having worked under Brazilian photojournalists for Reuters and AFP, Felipe hopes to one day work on demanding journalistic projects and contribute to the global news cycle.

Ann Schmidt

News Editor | Ann is a liberal studies sophomore who lived in Florence during her freshman year. She plans on double-majoring in journalism and political science and is always busy. She is constantly making lists and she loves to laugh.


Daniel Yeom

Daniel started at the Features desk of WSN last Spring, writing restaurant reviews whilst indulging on free food and consequently getting fat. Last Fall, he was the dining editor, and he this semester he is senior editor. Daniel is in Gallatin (living the dream) studying Food & Travel Narratives, incorporating aspects of Food Studies, Journalism, and Media, Culture, and Communication. He loves food more than life itself.

Hannah Luu

Deputy Multimedia Editor | Hannah Luu is a ridiculously great Deputy Multimedia Editor. She is a sophomore from Northern California. If you think Northern California means San Francisco you might need to closely examine a map. She is passionate about NPR and being half Asian.

  • How to join:

    The Washington Square News holds open weekly budget meetings at its office located at 838 Broadway every Sunday. All are welcome to attend, no matter your background in journalism, writing, or reporting. Specific times for meetings by desk are listed below. If you wish to talk to an editor before you attend, feel free to check out the Staff page.

    5 P.M. 6 P.M. 6 P.M. 6:30 P.M. 6:30 P.M. 7 P.M.

    Applying for an editor position: Applications for editor positions during the fall or spring semesters are available twice each academic year and can be found here when posted. Applications for the Fall 2012 semester are closed, but check back for Spring 2013. Those who wish to apply are urged to publish pieces in the newspaper and contact current editors for shadowing.

    History of the Washington Square News:

    The Washington Square News is the official daily student newspaper of New York University and serves the NYU, Greenwich Village, and East Village communities. Founded as an independent newspaper in 1973, the WSN allows its undergraduate writers and photographers to cover campus and city news and continues to grow its strong body of award-winning journalists and photographers.

  • The WSN has a circulation of about 60,000 and can be found in over a hundred purple bins distributed throughout campus. It is published Monday through Thursday during the fall and spring semesters and online on Friday, with additional special issues published in the summer. The newspaper recently revamped its website during the Fall 2012 semester.

    Like few campus newspapers in the country, the paper is editorially and financially independent from the university and is solely responsible for selling advertisements to fund its production. The WSN, including its senior staff, is run solely by current undergraduate students and the business-division is largely student-operated as well.

    A Board of Directors comprised of alumni, NYU professors and working news media professionals serves as advisors to the paper. Board members have no control in the WSN's editorial policy or newsroom operations. Alumni of the newspaper are established and leading journalists in such news organizations as The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, NBC news, ABC news, Fox News, and USA Today.