Why would anybody mess with Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s face?
The controversy behind “Looper,” this season’s groundbreaking blockbuster, reached beyond the boundaries of most sci-fi films, with the bulk of it centering on the lead actor’s visage. Since Bruce Willis plays an older version of Gordon-Levitt’s character, director Rian Johnson wanted the young actor to appear more like the grizzled action star.
However, the film’s core stretches far beyond such perceived superficial oddities. “Looper” does not take itself too seriously in its handling of the tricky subject of time travel. Every element of the film has a purpose, and “Looper” is both elegantly crafted and uniquely practical, considering its genre. Presenting a more mature take on the sci-fi genre, the film is flashy without trying too hard.
The media culture is at a point where most art is inspired by — or a near replication of — earlier work. “Looper” breaks the mold, presenting a captivating film that is reminiscent of few other cinematic adventures. It does not insult the audience’s intelligence, choosing instead to represent an example of science fiction at its best. Even those who have no interest in science fiction may be shocked by how “Looper” will engage them. It thrives on its ability to meld the best of multiple film genres, combining character study, mystery, suspense, action-adventure and science fiction into a compelling two hours.
Riddled with metaphors of self-control and centering on a man who sets out to kill all of his enemies, “Looper” is geared toward a more mature audience. The film weaves the common thread of love through every conflict, developing a strange yet beautiful sentiment without the associated clichés. Complemented by an all-star cast that includes Gordon-Levitt, Willis and Emily Blunt, the success of “Looper” hopefully means that science fiction will never be the same.
A version of this article appeared in the Thursday, Dec. 6 print edition. Isabel Jones is a staff writer. Email her at [email protected].
