But what are the *substantive* arguments against Varadarajan's article?
For the kum-ba-yah statements of the people quoted in this article to come from the mouths of intellectuals at a university is truly shameful.
Academics should be dedicated to truth. How about going through Varadarajan's column, sentence by sentence, and discussing whether the words are true are not? Wouldn't that be more productive, not to mention honest, than random spoutings about "injustice" and "standing up for rights?"
leave a comment
Comments from unregistered users will appear once they are approved. Log in to have your comment show up immediately.
SteveR
Nov 18, 2009
6:03 p.m.
But what are the *substantive* arguments against Varadarajan's article?
For the kum-ba-yah statements of the people quoted in this article to come from the mouths of intellectuals at a university is truly shameful.
Academics should be dedicated to truth. How about going through Varadarajan's column, sentence by sentence, and discussing whether the words are true are not? Wouldn't that be more productive, not to mention honest, than random spoutings about "injustice" and "standing up for rights?"