Considering the fact that you already published the guy's name, what's the point of being wishy-washy with this editorial, unless, as 09Grad states, you have a "guilty conscience". Frankly, the generalizations made here reflect poorly on WSN. And what's with "no member of the board was involved in WSN's decision to publish the name"? You *are* WSN. The buck stops here and all that stuff.
leave a comment
Comments from unregistered users will appear once they are approved. Log in to have your comment show up immediately.
Observer
Nov 05, 2009
1:42 a.m.
Considering the fact that you already published the guy's name, what's the point of being wishy-washy with this editorial, unless, as 09Grad states, you have a "guilty conscience". Frankly, the generalizations made here reflect poorly on WSN. And what's with "no member of the board was involved in WSN's decision to publish the name"? You *are* WSN. The buck stops here and all that stuff.